Dear Editor,
The casino question-and-answer story was very interesting.
At no time did the attorney, Mr. Phil Thompson, answer a
question directly. This must be his Bureau of Indian Affairs
training, you know,
”
only respond with another question and avoid an answer at all
times.
”
Dear Editor,
The casino question-and-answer story was very interesting.
At no time did the attorney, Mr. Phil Thompson, answer a question directly. This must be his Bureau of Indian Affairs training, you know, “only respond with another question and avoid an answer at all times.”
The only question he answered was that the alleged tribe will work with the community. However, the community should not expect any of the questions to be answered or resolved.
As for question #4: Does this proposed project have anything to do with the Lytton San Pablo deal? How about Mr. Thompson is one of the lawyers for that deal. That is definitely a connection – a direct connection to San Pablo. Nice try Phil!!!!
Joanne Villa, Hollister
