49.7 F
Gilroy
April 23, 2026

Doing the best we can after such a terrible tragedy

When a young person filled with life and possibilities dies in a

Letter: Open Hollister rail line for more commuter options

I agree with Morgan Hill Mayor Mark Turner in regard to considering options for Caltrain rail service in the future. In the same vein, Gilroy City Councilmember Zach Hilton must be commended for his effort to work with South County representatives in attempting to...

Opinion: Fix Community Colleges

It’s been three years since the board of directors of California’s 113 community colleges enacted its “if we don’t build it they won’t come” policy, and the results are plain depressing.In an effort to save money, the directors decided to prohibit students from repeating classes they’ve already taken, which to a bean counter might sound like a great way to cut expenses, but to someone who believes that the community should have access to community colleges, it’s plain stupid.Known as the “yoga mom’s regulation,” board members thought that too many community members were taking physical education, yoga and arts courses for $100 a semester, when they should be paying that each week to take courses in the private sector.So, cut they did and some 200,000 students who went to the schools for lifelong education dropped out. In the words of California Community Colleges Board of Governors President Scott Himelstein:“Budget cuts have forced us to ration education, and we are currently turning away hundreds of thousands of students from our campuses that want to pursue a degree, transfer to a four-year university or get job training so they can get back into the workforce or advance in their current career. It doesn’t make sense for us to allow students to take the same physical education course four times on the taxpayer’s dime while we are closing our doors on those looking for a degree or seeking job skills.”The problem is having to “ration education” at colleges that are supposed to serve the whole community.Himelstein says the taxpayers shouldn’t have to pay for people repeating courses, but the taxpayers are the same people who want to repeat the courses and continue learning for life and refining their skills, whether they are in music, arts, writing or yoga. They are already paying for them, often generously, by passing big ticket bonds to keep the education flowing.Attendance at Gavilan College has dropped since the cutbacks from a high of 9,064 in 2009 to 6,152 in the current semester. Some of the cuts include all of the non-credit courses for seniors, which were once the definition of a diverse college serving the entire community.And students at all of the schools aren’t happy with the limits. The public college system was one of the greatest things about California and now officials are letting it go to seed.Be warned: voters in some communities are starting to rebel. Santa Cruz taxpayers, who usually approve every bond measure the community district asks for, turned down a $310 million measure to improve old buildings at Cabrillo College. Who can blame them? Why add more to your tax bill when the school has closed its doors to you? You can use the money on private classes, as the state community college board suggests.We see this as the beginning of the end of one of the greatest educational systems in the world, unless voters get involved and urge their local districts to restore the lifelong learning opportunities that they had.The academic senate at Victor Valley College passed a resolution asking the state to return to the way it was, claiming that lack of repeatability “severely limits” the ability of students of visual and performing arts build the portfolios they need to transfer.The limits were put in place when schools were turning away students, but that isn’t the case now, they said. They are asking the state to restore programs that contribute to a skilled progressive workforce, “fostering a creative, innovative citizenry, capable of critical thought; promoting community, vision, health and lifelong learning; nourishing a diverse, multi-generational context in which all Californians can learn and grow.”The economy has improved since the dire times of the Great Recession. It’s time to stop the severe austerity and make our community colleges great again.

A Humorous Take on Monday’s City Council

This fanciful letter was received by open space advocate Connie Rogers. We don't know the author 7 December 2015With my apologies to Mr. Shakespeare & Mark Antony Friends, Gilroy Residents, Lovers of Small Town Character! Lend me your ears! I have come to bury the USA Amendment 14-01, not to praise it. The evil that this amendment could do would live on forever and permanently change Gilroy; the good that it would do for a very few people should be sacrificed for the benefit of all. Our noble Mayor has told us that Gilroy must grow, and if it is true, it is a grievous thing that we must sacrifice the small town character that we love for the benefit of a multitude of north-dwelling and north-working newcomers to our fair city. But our Mayor must be correct, for he is an honorable man! So is Councilman Woodward an honorable man. And he says we must have “local control” of this land. For without local control, rapacious San Martin might gobble up the land, or Hollister may leapfrog-annex it before we can. We must protect the land from such nefarious interests, says Councilman Woodward, and he is an honorable man!  Some of our elected representatives tell us that only with a large tract of land can an excellent plan be made, and that they have only the highest standards for development in Gilroy. They say that small infill developments are inefficient and insufficient for our growth needs. They tell us that they know better than we do what Gilroy needs and how to achieve it. They brush off the consistent counsel of their Planning Commission, their professional planners and consultants they have paid, and attendees to every public meeting for planning Gilroy’s future held in the past year. We must all be wrong, and they must be right, because they are honorable representatives.  Council members who vote for this amendment do so perhaps out of pure motives, for they are honorable people. One of them might wish for the Mayor’s endorsement in his campaign for elected office; another might subscribe to the need for “local control”. Yet another may actually believe that “active senior housing” located as far from downtown as possible is the best place for those pesky active seniors. But I honor most those council members who vote against the amendment! The initiative of Mayor Gage and Councilman Woodward to increase election spending and campaign contribution limits is surely a good thing, and wealthy landowners and developers would surely agree, since they are all honorable people. Passage of the USA Amendment tonight would surely please those few people, even though the rest of Gilroy’s 53,000 residents apparently feel differently. We all should remember this at next year’s election, for we are voters and we too are honorable people. The mischief is afoot! 

Letters: Forget the bullet train, what about Amtrak?

It has come to my attention that twice a day, the Amtrak

Pink at City Hall = Bonds in Tutu

The following organizations and individuals deserve either

SOCIAL MEDIA

10,025FansLike
1,500FollowersFollow
2,589FollowersFollow