The debate that has erupted over the proposals for the arts
center slated for Monterey and Seventh streets is a good one for
Gilroy.
The debate that has erupted over the proposals for the arts center slated for Monterey and Seventh streets is a good one for Gilroy.

Architects presented four designs, and the surprise favorite of the cultural facilities task force was a modern marble, glass and copper design.

Some say the building is too modern for Gilroy’s downtown full of historic old buildings. Others say a contemporary building might be the kick start needed to begin revitalizing the rest of Gilroy’s beleaguered downtown.

Whatever design the city eventually chooses – whether it’s the one favored by the task force, one of the runners-up or a completely different plan resulting from a fresh start at the drawing board – we encourage everyone in Gilroy to participate in the debate.

Opening the process to as many citizens as possible enables them to take ownership of the facility, which is sorely needed but looks like a luxury in these cash-strapped times. Finding $11.5 million to build the facility and an as-yet undetermined amount to operate it will be a higher priority for city officials if citizens are clamoring for the center they helped to design.

Another benefit of the design debate is that it will help to shape the overall vision this community has for a revitalized downtown. The arts center controversy will force us to confront key questions: Do we want to look to the past as we revamp the neglected core of our city? If so, do we want to look to Spanish, Flemish, Victorian or Craftsman influences? We have examples of these types of construction – and more – favored by our forebears in many new and historic buildings throughout South Valley: the Gilroy Historical Museum, the Morgan Hill Community Center, Old City Hall, the original Saint Louise Hospital, the Old Gilroy Fire House, Carden Academy, South Valley National Bank, Villa Mira Monte and the Chesbro House.

Or do we want this generation to put its stamp on downtown with modern architecture with a contemporary sensibility? There’s a valid argument to be made that a community should not imitate the past but should reflect its own era as it constructs significant buildings.

Whichever direction the community chooses to go, let’s have a vigorous, open debate about the pros and cons of each option, come to a consensus and build enthusiasm for making a beautiful, functional Gilroy Arts and Cultural Center a reality.

Previous articleLet’s not start a war over who was responsible for killing Jesus
Next articleTeen dead in possible suicide

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here