Politics

During tonight’s regular City Council meeting, Mayor Don Gage asked that a "Quality of Life" bond measure discussion be put on the agenda for the Council’s next scheduled meeting on June 3.

The Santa Clara Valley Water District is accepting applications

In what will surely make an interesting closed session of the Gilroy City Council on Jan. 19, not one, but two lawsuits have been filed against the city regarding its controversial annexation plan involving 721 acres north of Gilroy.A group of Gilroy property owners, who had tried to develop housing south of Gilroy have sued to stop the city from pursuing the northern project. They said they were told not to pursue their plans and then found that the city approved the other big project.Ken Kerley and Daniel Fiorio's suit challenges the City Council’s Dec. 7 decision to approve the 721-acre project and certify the environmental impact report (EIR), without first analyzing and mitigating potential environmental impacts, arguing such actions are “unlawful under CEQA [California Environmental Quality Act] and California planning and zoning laws.”LAFCO, the state-mandated agency tasked with controlling urban sprawl, also filed a lawsuit on Jan. 13 at the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which argued the city broke the law when it approved the annexation of 721 acres of farmland as part of a planned 4,000-home development.The landowners’ lawsuit further attests the city council’s approval of the project causes the city’s general plan to be “internally inconsistent,” in violation of state planning and zoning laws.Both suits also name the project’s investors and landowners, including Martin Limited Partnership, Wren Investors LLC, and Mark Hewell.Like the first suit, this one asks the court to not allow this land to be annexed by the city.Kerley and Fiorio are no strangers to City Hall. In July 2013 they were part of a consortium of landowners that submitted their own application to amend the city’s Urban Service Area to encompass approximately 150 acres in the unincorporated south Gilroy neighborhood district (called South Gilroy USA Proposal in the lawsuit), where the two own property.The petitioners allege in the lawsuit that in January 2014, city staff provided them with an evaluation of the South Gilroy USA Proposal and advised them to withdraw their application and not to resubmit until after the city adopted its 2040 general plan, which was then underway. The petitioners followed the recommendation and withdrew their application five days later.In July 2014, the city accepted Martin Limited Partnership’s application to add 721 acres into the city’s USA boundary even as the city was still developing its 2040 general plan, contrary to the advice allegedly given to the landowners behind the 150-acre south Gilroy proposal.Approval of the 721-acre project is “premature and should await adoption of the 2040 general Plan,” the lawsuit states.The general plan was approved by the City Council on Jan. 4, clearing the way for an environmental review and final reading sometime this summer.        

Unless the city's four unions make major concessions this week,

Wearing white T-shirts with black lettering that reads: “Sanctuary for All,” dozens of immigrant advocates and their allies filled council chambers on Monday to witness city leaders proclaim their support of all residents, regardless of citizenship status.

Fed up with early morning noise and traffic from ongoing construction, residents of one of Gilroy’s newest high-end subdivisions woke up to a new neighbor this week.It’s a manned guard shack that showed up in the middle of the roundabout at the entrance to Meritage Homes’ Heartland housing development.It’s designed to control the flow of construction-related traffic and keep noise levels down in the before-dawn hours.But a city official Tuesday said it must be moved.“I understand why they did this but it’s not in a safe location, so we will ask the developer to move this to a safer spot until they finish construction activities, Rick Smelser said in an email. He is Gilroy’s director of public works and city engineer.The playhouse-size structure was set up on city property, the roundabout island at the corner of West Third Street and Cobblestone Court, just west of Santa Teresa Boulevard and the Village Green senior housing community.A spokesman for C&C Security said Meritage requested the manned booth after receiving complaints from new residents of the $870,000 to $943,000 homes.They’ve complained about pre-dawn noise and traffic from contractors building more new homes in developments that stretch roughly along Hecker Pass Highway west from Santa Teresa to Burchell Road.Chapter 16, section 31 of the city code prohibits loud noise of any kind that disturbs another person in their home between the hours of 10 p.m. and 7 a.m. Wayne Spalding, vice president of human resources for the Fremont-based C&C Security, said a uniformed guard arrives early in the morning to make sure no one begins work before 7 a.m.The guard then patrols the neighborhood and construction areas from a vehicle, he said.The project’s new construction manager requested that the guard shack be placed on the roundabout island, according to Spalding.An early morning observer to the area would witness not only the arrival of construction workers, but also large and small trucks loaded with everything from pre-fabricated housing rafters to roofing materials and landscaping equipment and plants.The long, new stretch of W 3rd Street, with at least one elementary school bus stop, also has become the scene of high-speed driving, the almost universal running of the stop sign at Rosemary Drive by residents, construction workers and truck drivers, and numerous incidents of cars and trucks going the wrong way at the roundabout—some trucks doing so because they are too long to negotiate the sharp curves of the roundabout.At the Gilroy Police Department, Capt. Kurt Svardal said the guard shack arrangement between the private security firm and the development company does not involve police, although he said he was “a little surprised” by the location of the structure on the roundabout.Smelser said that while he was unaware of the guard shack until asked about it Tuesday by the Dispatch, builders are legally allowed to take steps to secure their projects and equipment even if it involves city property.“During construction, before the city has fully accepted the construction, the contractor has every right to protect their equipment,” he said.As for traffic and noise associated with building activities, he said, “They have every right to control what is going on during construction; if they want to control construction activity, I can see that,” Smelser added.A spokesperson for the Meritage did not return phone calls seeking comment.   

The Gilroy City Council Monday night will discuss whether to pay more out- of-pocket for legal services on an hourly basis, as recommended by City Administrator Tom Haglund.

As of Sept. 1, those in the Santa Clara County who receive subsidies from the government's Section 8 voucher program will be required to put 35 percent of their income toward rent – a 5 percent increase from the subsidy that has been in place for decades.