79.1 F
Gilroy
May 18, 2026

4 letters: Thanks for support; teachers do a great job; depiction not art

Generous community given praise from a thankful community organization

4 letters: Warmth to troops, no one to blame, free health care

Make a point now to bring some warmth to Christmas for our American troops overseas

Community Pulse: Should the school district spend $3 million to fix fields (copy)

Should the school district spend approximately $3 million to fix the fields and build a sports complex at Christopher High School?

Community Pulse: Should Gilroy be concerned about the new outlet mall?

As a community, should Gilroy be concerned about the new outlet mall opening in Livermore attracting away a significant chunk of business?

Gilroy better worry about new outlets

As a community, Gilroy should be worried about the huge, brand-spanking-new outlet mall opening in Livermore.

Three letters: Prop 38, Prop 35 and anti-Obama display

Proposition 38 a dramatic 12-year tax increase that will cause pain across the board

Editorial: Hollister district shows contempt for charter school petition

The fact that the Hollister School District paid a law firm specifically to find “deficiencies” in a charter school petition underscores the sharp lines drawn in a political battle against reform models and shows that local officials - despite glaring evidence it would likely spur academic success - are steadfast against changing a failed system.

Bankruptcies should matter to voters

When it comes to electing public officials, bankruptcies matter.

THIS WEEK’S POLL: Does knowing that a local candidate has filed for bankruptcy in the past have a bearing on your vote?

• Yes. While bankruptcy is many times unavoidable, it still likely reflects some fiscal irresponsibility in getting there. It certainly would cause me to take a closer look at what may have been the reason and then a judgment as to their ability to understand city financial matters. • Yes. Public representatives should be held to a higher standard of care since they having direct control over our health, safety and welfare and the potential to abuse the power entrusted to them! • No. Especially if the bankruptcy was many years ago.  We need to concentrate on current issues and concerns. • Yes, somewhat. While I try to keep in mind that often bankruptcy is unavoidable, it does give me pause and make me consider their candidacy a little more. • Yes.  Personal fiscal responsibility reflects a person's ability to be fiscally responsible with our tax dollars. • Yes. I don't think knowing a candidate filed bankruptcy in the past would keep me from voting for them, but the voters need to know all the information that helps us make an informed decision about a candidate. Someone who filed bankruptcy may not be the best candidate to run our city. • No. I have voted already. That said we are asking candidates to manage city budgets so this could potentially be a deciding factor. • Of course it should. There’s judgment involved and we need our Council people to make good decisions and fiscal issues are critical to the health of the city. Spending all the city funds and declaring bankruptcy would not be a good idea. • No. However, personal monetary decisions made public through declaring bankruptcy can sway people into believing that this will transfer into the candidate’s decision making processes in a public servant position. I don’t believe this is true, given personal money issues have many factors that we may not be aware of nor should we be. • No. The bankruptcy itself would not change my vote. If I knew the reason why it occurred may change my vote.

1 letter: Huge problem with contract firm for Gilroy dog licensing

Anyone else having trouble with Gilroy’s ‘Pet Data system’ for licensing a dog in the city?

SOCIAL MEDIA

10,025FansLike
1,502FollowersFollow
2,589FollowersFollow