54.4 F
Gilroy
December 26, 2025

Update: Woodward, Aulman and Tucker new Council members

The votes are in for Gilroy's City Council election, and voters showed that they wanted no major overhaul to the DNA of the dais –  incumbents Cat Tucker and Perry Woodward secured their spot for another four years, while newcomer Terri Aulman won the slot of retiring Councilman Bob Dillon.

Local builder’s patience crumbles after historical gurus delay forced project

Steve Ashford was happy to see public safety trump history, but

Officials respond to trashed Gilroy waterway

GILROY—Recent rains helped return water to bone dry streams such as Uvas Creek in Christmas Hill Park. But the rainfall also exacerbated the issue of debris in a seasonal channel that weaves through central Gilroy neighborhoods.

Doctors’ union is largest donor to sales tax measure 

A union of physicians earning up to $1 million a year is the biggest funder of the ballot measure to raise local sales taxes. A week after the Santa Clara County Board of Supervisors approved a plan to raise county taxes, the county’s largest...

Another car giant falls

UPDATED at 2:20 p.m. Thursday: A week after Gilroy Pontiac Buick

Second Suit Filed Against Big Development

In what will surely make an interesting closed session of the Gilroy City Council on Jan. 19, not one, but two lawsuits have been filed against the city regarding its controversial annexation plan involving 721 acres north of Gilroy.A group of Gilroy property owners, who had tried to develop housing south of Gilroy have sued to stop the city from pursuing the northern project. They said they were told not to pursue their plans and then found that the city approved the other big project.Ken Kerley and Daniel Fiorio's suit challenges the City Council’s Dec. 7 decision to approve the 721-acre project and certify the environmental impact report (EIR), without first analyzing and mitigating potential environmental impacts, arguing such actions are “unlawful under CEQA [California Environmental Quality Act] and California planning and zoning laws.”LAFCO, the state-mandated agency tasked with controlling urban sprawl, also filed a lawsuit on Jan. 13 at the Santa Clara County Superior Court, which argued the city broke the law when it approved the annexation of 721 acres of farmland as part of a planned 4,000-home development.The landowners’ lawsuit further attests the city council’s approval of the project causes the city’s general plan to be “internally inconsistent,” in violation of state planning and zoning laws.Both suits also name the project’s investors and landowners, including Martin Limited Partnership, Wren Investors LLC, and Mark Hewell.Like the first suit, this one asks the court to not allow this land to be annexed by the city.Kerley and Fiorio are no strangers to City Hall. In July 2013 they were part of a consortium of landowners that submitted their own application to amend the city’s Urban Service Area to encompass approximately 150 acres in the unincorporated south Gilroy neighborhood district (called South Gilroy USA Proposal in the lawsuit), where the two own property.The petitioners allege in the lawsuit that in January 2014, city staff provided them with an evaluation of the South Gilroy USA Proposal and advised them to withdraw their application and not to resubmit until after the city adopted its 2040 general plan, which was then underway. The petitioners followed the recommendation and withdrew their application five days later.In July 2014, the city accepted Martin Limited Partnership’s application to add 721 acres into the city’s USA boundary even as the city was still developing its 2040 general plan, contrary to the advice allegedly given to the landowners behind the 150-acre south Gilroy proposal.Approval of the 721-acre project is “premature and should await adoption of the 2040 general Plan,” the lawsuit states.The general plan was approved by the City Council on Jan. 4, clearing the way for an environmental review and final reading sometime this summer.        

Gilroy Economic Development Corporation adopts new Action Plan

The Gilroy Economic Development Corporation formally adopted a new Action Plan at its board meeting Wednesday. The plan will focus on three core objectives for Gilroy: Business attraction, business expansion/retention and partner development.

Bye-bye, plastic bags

  No longer an oasis of polyethylene in Santa Clara County, Gilroy joined the rest of the state in getting rid of single-use plastic bags, as California voted to ban the environmental hazard on Nov. 8, the first state in the nation to do so.Proposition 67, which put plastic shopping bags on the chopping block, was passed 52 to 48 percent and created a unified law for the state, which saw an increasing number of local jurisdictions take up the issue since San Francisco became the first city in California to ban plastic bags in 2007.“It’s for the environment, no plastic bags is okay with me; I can carry my stuff,” said Gilroy resident, Kaylee Amaro, who was seen carrying her shopping, a package of cookies, outside Safeway on Friday.Effective immediately, the plastic bag ban restricts food retailers, corner markets and grocery stores from providing single-use plastic bags. Recyclable paper bags can be bought for 10 cents each. The money collected is kept by the retailer. A competing measure, Prop. 65, would have directed the fees to be used for environmental activities, but it did not pass.Before last week’s vote settled the matter in California, 122 ordinances banning single-use plastic bags had been approved in the state, covering 151 county or local jurisdictions, according to Ballotpedia. That is nearly half of California.In Gilroy, a single-use plastic bag ban was discussed by the City Council, first in 2008 to support the Cities Association of Santa Clara County and again a few years later, but the council took no action.In April, Councilwoman Cat Tucker reintroduced the issue at a policy meeting, but it was not pursued by the council.Now, Tucker, who won re-election to the council on Nov. 8, said she had been expecting the proposition to pass.A poll in October showed 45 percent of likely California voters supported the ban, along with a wide swathe of businesses, unions and organizations. Prop.67 was also endorsed by Gov. Jerry Brown and local state Senator Bill Monning.“I am happy,” said Tucker. “I personally always bring cloth bags when I go grocery shopping.”The passage of Prop 67 ratified Senate Bill 270, banning plastic bags in the state, considered a landmark bill when Governor Jerry Brown signed it in 2014.The bill was shelved after a successful signature-gathering effort by American Progressive Bag Alliance, a lobby group for plastic bag manufacturers, stalled it in its tracks.The same group spent $6.14 million to fight Prop. 67, and despite raising almost double the amount raised by the Yes on 67 campaign, it failed to stop momentum to ban that had been building across the state.Now, shoppers in Gilroy will have to kick their plastic bag habit, just like others in Santa Clara County did in years past.Plastic bags were banned in unincorporated areas of the county, including San Martin, since 2012. Morgan Hill’s ban began on Earth Day (April 22) 2014. San Jose has been plastic bag free since 2011.Even though the writing has been on the wall for sometime now, the change caught some by surprise at the grocery store in the days after the election.“It’s hard when you have the two kids and are trying to carry everything,” said Noemi Santiago, as she left with her two young children and an armload of groceries from Safeway on First Street.The plastic bag ban will not just require a behavioral shift from Gilroy shoppers, but for some residents, a lifestyle shift as well.“I like the plastic bags because you can throw garbage in them and tie them up and throw them in the garbage can,” said Dotty, a Gilroy resident who did not want to give her last name.Exiting Safeway on Friday, Dotty’s shopping cart was filled with paper bags, but she said she will start bringing her reusables.“I have my own bags in the car, so I will start using those. I like a bag that you could wash. The ones they are selling for 25 cents are too flimsy.”And while Dotty will happily change her shopping habits, she did not vote for the proposition.“I can’t believe in this, I’m sorry, I just don’t. I didn’t vote for it,” she said. “And this global warming stuff—I don’t believe in that either. I mean, the world changes automatically. That’s the way God made it and it’s not because of me doing something. Even if it was, even if everybody in the United States didn’t use plastic bags, didn’t do this, didn’t do that, it isn’t going to do a darn thing because the other countries are not doing it. You think our air is going to be any cleaner than theirs? No. So it’s just another way to get our money.”According to the Center for Biological Diversity, there was more plastic manufactured in the first decade of the 21st century, than in all the years leading up to 2000, and single-use plastic bags have become a target for those concerned about the level of plastic pollution in the environment.Less than 5 percent of plastic bags are recycled in California, so the majority end up as litter or in landfills and they are not biodegradable. They are made from polyethylene, which takes up to 1,000 years to decompose.It is estimated that 100,000 marine mammals die each year because of plastic litter in the North Pacific, according to marine research organization Algalita. A recent report from UC-Davis found that marine birds are attracted to the smell of plastic and consume the shimmery material, mistaking it for food.   

South County reps cautious on impeachment

As the question of whether to impeach President Donald Trump loomed over the California Democratic Convention the weekend of May 31, local representatives continued to resist the pressure to advocate impeachment. Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi grew more emboldened in her calls to hold...

Feds poke leak in city coffers

The federal government has forced the city to pay $252,000 to

SOCIAL MEDIA

10,025FansLike
1,451FollowersFollow
2,589FollowersFollow