I realize and appreciate that we have hit media
”
paydirt
”
with a famous actor/bodybuilder’s decision to run for
governor.
Dear Editor:
I realize and appreciate that we have hit media “paydirt” with a famous actor/bodybuilder’s decision to run for governor. This is a field day for press and entertainment reporting alike, because both are combined once again, to create maximum public attention.
There is only one problem. As interesting and exciting as it is for the press and the entertainment industry, the state of California may not be best served by electing someone based solely on media frenzy. Correct me if I’m wrong, but the only thing our actor candidate has ever done in the public policy arena is lend his name to an after-school program. He speaks in slogans from his movies and floats on the fame and popularity of stardom.
The other day I saw a synopsis of the other candidates represented by graphs showing who had completed registration. Beyond that, little in-depth information. It’s easy to see why: none of the other candidates come anywhere close to an actor’s name recognition and fame. However, most of those running are sincere, and one or two might even be qualified to serve.
I think I speak for a lot of Californians when I say to you in the media; I BEG you, PLEASE begin balanced reporting of the positions and platforms of the respective candidates.
You owe it to us to give us the information we need to make the best decision for the people of California. We will still be living in this state after the media party is over. Please do your duty to the people you serve.
Bill C. Jones, Gilroy
Submitted Friday, Aug. 8
