Is the city spending too much on downtown group?
The Gilroy Downtown Business Association found itself in the crosshairs at the City Council meeting on Monday, after its annual funding from the city was pulled from the consent agenda and brought forward for discussion.
The race is on for state assembly seat
Four candidates and incumbent Anna Caballero have filed
Sheriff candidate charged with perjury
A 48-year-old Cupertino woman who ran for the position of Santa Clara County sheriff in the June 7 primary election has been charged with perjury for allegedly saying she had the law enforcement experience required to qualify for the job, prosecutors said.
Anh Colton, who...
Ohio finds relief in election
COLUMBUS, Ohio – For many in Ohio, the ritual of stepping up to a ballot machine on Tuesday came with a sense of relief that the long, ugly presidential race was finally drawing to a close.
UPDATE: Gilroy Dispatch California Election
Tuesday's election included seven candidates vying for three
Former developer owes city $45K for barbed wire fence
A former Gilroy developer who constructed a 9-foot-tall barbed wire fence around his home after he was savagely beaten in 2008 owes the City of Gilroy more than $45,000 in fees that started with a simple $200 citation for his out-of-code safety precaution.
High-speed rail funding from bonds could be in jeopardy
SACRAMENTO - The California Legislature should not authorize the issuance of $6 billion in bonds to start building the state's $98.5 billion bullet train project, a state-appointed review panel says in a key report to be released Tuesday.
E-cigs to face same restrictions as tobacco in unincorporated areas
Starting later this summer, the use and sale of electronic smoking devices—or e-cigarettes—will be regulated the same as tobacco in unincorporated Santa Clara County.On June 10, the county’s Board of Supervisors approved an ordinance that adds the increasingly popular devices to the county’s tobacco control ordinances, according to the county press release.The changes include restricting e-cigarette sales near schools, banning smoking in common areas of multi-unit residents, and protecting the social norm advances related to tobacco use by restricting e-cigarette use in public places outside any city limits in Santa Clara County, according to a county press release.The new e-cigarette use restrictions will go into effect July 24.E-cigarette retailers will be required to obtain a local permit and follow the same rules as tobacco retailers, according to the press release. Currently, there are 24 tobacco retailers in unincorporated areas of Santa Clara County, of which nine sell e-cigarettes.“Santa Clara County has been a leader in protecting and promoting the public health and welfare of our communities, implementing some of the strongest second hand smoke ordinances in the nation,” Supervisor Ken Yeager said. “Electronic smoking devices emit toxic chemicals, lead to an increase in nicotine use, and entice youth to smoke at an early age. E-cigarettes threaten the County’s goal of promoting a healthy community.”Yeager brought the County’s tobacco ordinances to the Board of Supervisors, and is Chair of the Board’s Health and Hospital Committee.In March, the Board voted to add e-cigarettes to the County’s no-smoking policies for County facilities, leased properties, Santa Clara Valley Medical Center and health clinics.E-cigarette restrictions will be added to the County’s three comprehensive measures, including the Smoking Pollution Control Ordinance, the Multi-Unit Residences Ordinance and the Tobacco Retailer Permit Ordinance, according to county staff. The use of electronic smoking devices will be restricted wherever smoking is prohibited by state or local law, which includes indoor and outdoor areas such as work sites, restaurants, bars and parks, according to the county release.The new county ordinance is a response to the growing use and popularity of e-cigarettes as an alternative to tobacco.“The lack of regulation and widespread availability of e-cigarettes nationwide have contributed to increasing social acceptance of e-cigarettes and the misperception that these products are somehow safe,” County Health Officer Sara Cody said. “E-cigarettes threaten to undo much of the social norm change around tobacco use, norm change that has undoubtedly saved lives, and largely resulted from policies like the ones implemented by the county.”A CDC study showed that, in 2011, 4.7 percent of all high school students had tried electronic smoking devices. By 2012, that figure had increased to 10 percent of all high school students. According to the County Public Health Department, there is growing evidence of potential health harms of smoking e-cigarettes such as cardiovascular disease and hypertension since they contain nicotine.
County floats hydration station ordinance
Santa Clara County staff and supervisors are studying a proposal to require all new commercial buildings to install water bottle filling stations, also known as “hydration stations” and “drink tap” stations.
Council mulling energy co-op
After kicking the can at its Feb. 22 meeting, the Gilroy City Council will again deliberate at its March 7 meeting whether to join Silicon Valley Community Choice Energy (CCE), a new multi-agency initiative that aims to cut the region’s greenhouse gas emissions by procuring cleaner forms of energy on behalf of its electricity customers.Led by the city of Sunnyvale, whose mayor, Glenn Hendricks, called the CCE one of the single most impactful strategies in that city’s action plan to meet targets for greenhouse gas reductions. The Silicon Valley CCE would purchase electricity on the open market for its customers, similar to a co-operative, instead of from PG&E.A recently released technical study of the CCE looked at three different program scenarios, two of which would lead to rate savings of 1 percent to 5 percent over time, while the third, which resulted in the greatest reductions in greenhouse gas emissions, would keep electricity rates at parity with PG&E.The investor-owned PG&E would continue to deliver the electricity and provide customer services. Energy bills would look similar, except for a notation showing electricity generated by Silicon Valley Community Choice Energy.The city of Sunnyvale, which serves as the project lead and fiscal agent, was joined by the cities of Cupertino, Mountain View and the county of Santa Clara in determining the feasibility of the project and facilitating the technical study, which also looked at other successful programs in the state.In addition to the four sponsoring agencies, Gilroy, Campbell, Los Altos, Los Altos Hills, Los Gatos, Monte Sereno, Morgan Hill and Saratoga all voiced interest in the CCE and together, the 12 jurisdictions would make up the service area.The technical study found that PG&E provides electricity to approximately 240,000 customers in the targeted region—90 percent residential, 10 percent commercial—consuming about 4 billion kilowatt hours of electricity annually.Although residential ratepayers make up the bulk of customer accounts, they only consume 34 percent of the region’s electricity. Sixty-five percent is designated as either commercial or industrial. The remaining one percent goes toward street lighting.The CCE would pool the electricity demand of the region’s 240,000 customers and procure a greater amount of energy from renewable sources than is currently offered by PG&E. The CCE also aims to provide competitive, potentially lower electricity rates for all customers while supporting new clean energy projects in the region.Customers would be automatically enrolled in the CCE program, although customers can choose to opt-out and stay with PG&E for bundled service.Other successful models the technical study looked at were programs in Marin and Sonoma counties and the city of Lancaster.The city of Gilroy is the last prospective member of the CCE to decide whether or not to join.A series of community meetings held last October in five of the jurisdictions, including Gilroy, showed 96 percent of attendees thought it was a good idea to create a locally controlled nonprofit to provide cleaner, greener electricity at competitive prices.Seventy-seven percent of attendees said their interest in the CCE was due to their desire to reduce their carbon footprint, while 88 percent said they were willing to pay a premium to have all of their electricity generated by renewable sources.At the Feb. 22 City Council meeting, councilmembers Cat Tucker, Dion Bracco, Terri Aulman joined Mayor Perry Woodward in voicing skepticism over the CCE, with Woodward saying it sounded almost “too good to be true.”Tucker worried about potential rate increases to Gilroy electricity customers, even though the technical study found no significant rate increases but rather potential savings of up to 5 percent over the course of the 10-year period.“Honestly, you don’t understand how much low-income families live in Gilroy. Our demographics are worse in all the county, even a $10, $5, $3 extra to PG&E could make a difference as to whether our soup kitchens have more people there in the week,” said Tucker during discussions.She also worried that the $150,000 Gilroy would have to approve to help cover startup costs, would prove unpalatable to an electorate clamoring for street improvements.Tucker said she was also wary of joining another regional body, fearing Gilroy would get short shrift in any decisionmaking.If Gilroy joined the CCE, the city would occupy a seat on the agency’s governing board and contribute to decisions on electricity rates and energy procurement.Waiting a year to join would jeopardize the city’s ability to contribute to these key decisions, argued Councilmember Peter Leroe-Muñoz.“Self-exclusion, taking ourselves out of the debate” would exacerbate any north-south divide, he said.Addressing concerns over potential rate increases, Leroe-Muñoz said he believed the plan, which he said really does aim to get lower rates for customers, actually works to alleviate a lot of those price pressures.“While there is no guarantee,” he told the council. “I like my chances a little bit better when I have a say in what those rates might be instead of leaving it up to someone else.”The council’s discussion of CCE continues on March 7.


















